Last three weeks
has been for me, least to say ‘different’. This is the longest ever I have
lived away from my family. However, I refer to this period as ‘different’ for three things
I manage to break, out of the new circumstances I have immersed myself into:
- I broke the cultural monotony I have had in the last 12 years through the first interactions with my new colleagues.
- I broke the boundaries of the job functions that I was exposed to for most part of my career and redrew my charted territory.
- I was forced to break the personal dependencies I had the luxury of and discover a path of self-reliance to my needs.
I have been
reading about people ‘moving out of their comfort zone’ and the difference that
it made it to their lives. The most glaring of them was that of an article on Steve
Jobs, in Gulf News today. (Oh yes, Gulf
News served to me by the hotel and not Times of India which I have been tied to
for the last 12 years.)
I landed in
Dubai early November yearning a change in my less than eventful career. Three
weeks hence, as I gather my thoughts and skim through the events, I think the
best phrase I could use to summarize my approach is “Constructive Pessimism”. I
define the phrase as, creative, cautious and simultaneous micro decisions evaluated on the incremental probabilities
of failure at every successive step and which on integration into a
quantifiable event; deliver a cumulative probability of success at the macro
level. There are three aspects to this definition, on the premise that the
thought process was the result of a reluctant, yet necessary move out of my
comfort zone:
- Creative, Cautious and Simultaneous micro decisions – The first step was to define the objective, break it into events and then define micro decisions. The micros had to be creative, to ensure that the action is not monotonous from that within the comfort zone; cautious since the threading were into unknown territories and simultaneous for the need to spread the risk.
- Assigning incremental probabilities of failure at each successive step – Every decision node requires an incremental commitment to the previous selection and it was only prudent to assign a higher probability of failure to each successive step. This would ensure that probabilities are evaluated based on the concurrent events when a credible base line is not available as a benchmark and hence strengthens the framework of the model being built to evaluate the holistic situation.
- Integration of the quantifiable event delivering a cumulative probability of success – Since the series of decision nodes has endured the lower probabilities of success assigned to them and has evolved as a successful chain of events; the integrated macro would carry an accumulated probability of success.
The process of “Constructive
Pessimism”, if could be proven mathematically, I look forward to a partner who
could work on this thought with me.